🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for further review if he holds objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in additional member states